La importancia del sistema de recompensa en la participación ciudadana online
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Introducción: el presente artículo realiza una revisión integradora sobre el papel del Sistema de Recompensa en la participación ciudadana en entornos digitales, sustentada en 73 fuentes publicadas entre 1990 y 2024. Sobre un marco teórico multidisciplinar se formula una Teoría del Cambio que articula la secuencia recompensas → motivación → participación → representatividad → trazabilidad. Metodología: la metodología combinó una búsqueda sistemática, la construcción de una matriz analítica y la codificación inductiva de evidencias conceptuales y empíricas. Resultados: los resultados muestran que las recompensas simbólicas, sorpresivas y no controladoras aumentan la motivación intrínseca y la participación activa. Cuando estos incentivos se implementan junto con mecanismos de retroalimentación estructurada y trazabilidad, contribuyen además a elevar la calidad de las aportaciones ciudadanas. Discusión: se extraen implicaciones prácticas para el diseño de plataformas participativas: priorizar recompensas coherentes con autonomía, competencia y relación; acompañar las estrategias de incentivos con programas de alfabetización digital y medidas de inclusión; y establecer métricas estandarizadas (KPIs) y evaluaciones éticas. Conclusiones: la investigación aporta un marco conceptual operativo para investigadores y responsables públicos interesados en fomentar una participación más inclusiva y de mayor calidad.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Citas
Álvarez-Rojas, J. L. y Preinfalk-Fernández, M. L. (2018). Program Theory and Theory of Change In Development Evaluation: A theoretical-practical review. Revista ABRA, 38(56), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.15359/abra.38-56.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/abra.38-56.2
Aragón, P., Kaltenbrunner, A., Calleja-López, A., Pereira, A., Monterde, A., Barandiaran, X. E. y Gómez, V. (2017). Deliberative platform design: The case study of the online discussions in Decidim Barcelona. En G. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi y T. Yasseri (Eds.), Social Informatics. SocInfo 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10540). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67256-4_22
Aubert, A. H., Scheidegger, A. y Schmid, S. (2023). Gamified online surveys: Assessing experience with self-determination theory. PLoS ONE, 18(10), e0292096. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0292096
Bastos, D., Fernández-Caballero, A., Pereira, A. y Rocha, N. P. (2022). Smart city applications to promote citizen participation in city management and governance: A systematic review. Informatics, 9(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9040089
Battistone, M. J., Kemeyou, L. y Varpio, L. (2023). The theoretical integrative review—A reader’s guide. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 15(4), 449-452. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00265.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00265.1
Bianchini, D., Fogli, D. y Ragazzi, D. (23-27 de octubre de 2016). Promoting citizen participation through gamification. En NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th nordic conference on human-computer interaction. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2971485.2971543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971543
Botella Nicolás, A. M. y Ramos Ramos, P. (2019). La teoría de la autodeterminación: un marco motivacional para el aprendizaje basado en proyectos. Contextos Educativos. Revista De Educación, 24, 253-269. https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18172/con.3576
Cassetti, V. y Paredes-Carbonell, J. J. (2020). Theory of change: A tool for participatory planning and evaluation in community health. Gaceta Sanitaria, 34(3), 305-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.06.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2019.06.002
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2ª ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514
Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., van Petegem, S. y Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 216-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
Daymon, C. y Holloway, I. (2010). Qualitative research methods in public relations and marketing communications (2ª ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203846544
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Deci, E. L. y Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. En P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski y E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 416-436). Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R. y Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R. y Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (MindTrek '11) (pp. 9-15). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Devisch, O., Poplin, A. y Sofronie, S. (2016). The gamification of civic participation: Two experiments in improving the skills of citizens to reflect collectively on spatial issues. Journal of Urban Technology, 23(2), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102419
DiMaggio, P. y Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University, 4(1), 4-2. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rhqmu DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rhqmu
García Guitián, E. (2011). Democracia digital. Discursos sobre participación ciudadana y TIC. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 173, 169-193. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.173.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.173.05
Gastil, J. y Broghammer, M. (2021). Linking Theories of Motivation, Game Mechanics, and Public Deliberation to Design an Online System for Participatory Budgeting. Political Studies, 69(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890815
Gordon, E. y Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2014). Playful civic learning: Enabling reflection and lateral trust in game-based public participation. International Journal of Communication, 8, 759-786. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2195/1100
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://bit.ly/4dpXX4R DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. y Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
Hassan, L. y Hamari, J. (2020). Gameful civic engagement: A review of the literature on gamification of e-participation. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101461
Kittilson, M. C. (2016). Gender and political behavior. En Hannah, E. (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.71
Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W. y Hommer, D. (2001). Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(16). https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-j0002.2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-16-j0002.2001
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without shortcuts: A participatory conception of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848189.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848189.001.0001
Landers, R. N., Auer, E. M., Collmus, A. B. y Armstrong, M. B. (2018). Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simulation & Gaming, 49(3), 315-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118774385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118774385
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D. y Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519
Lincoln, Y. S. y Guba, E. G. (5-9 de abril de 1988). Criteria for Assessing Naturalistic Inquiries as Reports. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Luisiana. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED297007.pdf
Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2012.6
Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology. Routledge. https://www.dhi.ac.uk/san/waysofbeing/data/data-crone-lupton-2015b.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315776880
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F. y Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson y J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale (pp. 1-26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914.002
Mayer, I. S. (2009). The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: A review. Simulation & Gaming, 40(6), 825-862. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109346456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109346456
Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012451663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012451663
Monje, J. A. (2017). Teoría del cambio en contextos complejos: 40 lecciones para la gestión de proyectos ágiles. AbacoEnRed.
Morozov, E. (19 de mayo de 2009). The brave new world of slacktivism. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/05/19/the-brave-new-world-of-slacktivism/
Pak, B., Chua, A. y Vande Moere, A. (2017). FixMyStreet Brussels: Socio-Demographic Inequality in Crowdsourced Civic Participation. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(2), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1270047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2016.1270047
Pérez-Escolar, M. y Navazo Ostúa, P. (2019). Activismo y narrativas gamificadas: Estudio comparativo de entornos ciberdemocráticos de empoderamiento ciudadano. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 24, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.5209/ciyc.64842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/ciyc.64842
Pineda Nebot, C. y Goldfrank, B. (2022). The digital participatory budgeting and the question of deliberation: The case of “Decide Madrid”. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 82, 253-286. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n82.a295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n82.a295
Resek, C. L., Siniscalchi, P. P., Caetano, B. P., Oliveira, K. W., Paula, M. M. y Souza, J. M. (2024). Gamification of citizen participation: a systematic mapping. IEEE Transactions on Games, 16(1), 1-15. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9927332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TG.2022.3216750
Richter, G., Raban, D. R. y Rafaeli, S. (2015). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. En T. Reiners y L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 21-46). Springer International Publishing. https://www.classes.cs.uchicago.edu/archive/2019/fall/20900-1/lecs/GamificationChapter.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2
Rogers, P. (2014). Theory of change: methodological briefs-impact evaluation No. 2. Methodological Briefs. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucf/metbri/innpub747.html
Romano, M., Díaz, P. y Aedo, I. (2022). Gamification-less: May gamification really foster civic participation? A controlled field experiment. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13, 4451-4465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03322-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03322-6
Ryan, R. M. y Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Schultz, W. (2015). Neuronal reward and decision signals: From theories to data. Physiological Reviews, 95(3), 853-951. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00023.2014
Senior, C., Temeljotov Salaj, A., Johansen, A. y Lohne, J. (2023). Evaluating the impact of public participation processes on participants in smart city development: A scoping review. Buildings, 13(6), 1484. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061484
Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-Centered AI. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior (No. 92904). Macmillan.
Strauss, A. y Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15, pp. 61-110). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Thiel, S. K., Reisinger, M., Röderer, K. y Fröhlich, P. (2016). Playing (with) democracy: A review of gamified participation approaches. JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government, 8(3), 32-60. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i3.440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v8i3.440
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2006). The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media (2ª ed.). Sage Publications.
Werbach, K. y Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.
Whittemore, R. y Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C. y Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103
Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Möller, J., Kruikemeier, S., Fathaigh, R. Ó., Irion, K., Dobber, T., Bodo, B. y de Vreese, C. (2018). Online political microtargeting: Promises and threats for democracy. Utrecht Law Review, 14(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.420