La violencia contra las mujeres en el contexto de la ira y la reivindicación de derechos: un análisis en X
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Las estadísticas internacionales y nacionales indican que Turquía lidera los países de la OCDE en cuanto a la prevalencia de la violencia contra las mujeres, junto con una tendencia al alza en los feminicidios. Reconociendo que las plataformas de redes sociales hacen más que informar sobre los acontecimientos, ya que moldean activamente la memoria colectiva, este estudio reconceptualiza X (antes Twitter) como un ecosistema de comunicación dinámico. Analizamos 30 613 tuits originales en turco publicados entre el 7 de noviembre de 2022 y el 16 de enero de 2023 utilizando un método mixto: minería de textos automatizada para redes de hashtags y métricas de interacción, combinada con un análisis de contenido y discurso en dos etapas que conserva las principales características de la plataforma, como hashtags, menciones, emojis y profundidad de los hilos. Basándonos en la teoría de la fijación de la agenda de segundo nivel, la investigación sobre amplificación algorítmica de Bruns y Moe, y el marco de memoria digital de Ferron y Massa, identificamos tres fenómenos de comunicación estratégica: «Puntos álgidos de ira» (cascadas de indignación impulsadas por hashtags), «Peticiones de reivindicación de derechos» (apelaciones a las instituciones mediadas por menciones) y «Debates de resistencia colectiva» (deliberaciones basadas en hilos). Nuestros hallazgos revelan que los picos en el discurso se alinean con rápidas cascadas de retuits y promociones de temas de tendencia; las menciones directas funcionan como peticiones colectivas para cambios legales y políticos; y los hilos de respuestas extendidos alimentan narrativas contrarias sostenidas. Estos grupos temáticos actúan como expresiones emocionales y herramientas de comunicación táctica, aprovechando las posibilidades algorítmicas de X para coordinar la indignación pública e integrar los debates sobre feminicidio en la memoria social. Al destacar estos mecanismos comunicativos, demostramos el doble papel de X como espejo y motor del sentimiento público, enfatizando su potencial para influir en los debates de políticas y apoyar la defensa contra la violencia hacia las mujeres.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Datos de los fondos
-
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Números de la subvención 122G088
Citas
Akgün, M. (2022). Increased penalties for combating violence against women and the offence of stalking. Seta Publications. https://setav.org/assets/uploads/2022/05/A372.pdf
Aliyev, R., & Karakus, M. (2015). The effects of positive psychological capital and negative feelings on students’ violence tendency. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.918
Alp, H. (2019). Kadina yönelik şiddet temali kamu spotu üzerinden Twitter kullanicilarinin tepki biçimleri. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 6(33), 427-437. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.1095
Astam, F. K., & Yılmaz, S. H. (2023). Kadına Yönelik Şiddet Olaylarında Sosyal Medyada Nefret Söyleminin Yeniden Üretimi: Helin Palandöken Cinayeti Örneği. Yeni Medya, 14, 310-326.https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1253857
Atay, T. (2004). Masculinity crushes men the most. Toplum ve Bilim, 101, 11-30.
Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (April 7, 2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
Averill, J. R. (2012). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. Springer Science & Business Media.
Aydın, A. (2021). Kadına Yönelik Şiddetle Mücadelede Cinsiyetçi ve Küfürlü Dilin Kullanılması Üzerine Bir İnceleme: Şule Çet Dayanışma Platformu Örneği. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences (IGUSABDER), 15, 533-547. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.937151
Başar, F., & Demirci, N. (2015). Gender inequality and violence. Journal of Women's Health Nursing, 2(1), 41-52. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kashed/issue/22285/239034
Bell, P. (2012). Content Analysis of Visual Images. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp. 31-57). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020062.n2
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Georgetown University Press.
Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social problems, 18(3), 298-306. https://doi.org/10.2307/799797
Boulding, K. E. (1973). Equality and conflict. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 409(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271627340900102
Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. In 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. Twitter and society [Digital formations, volume 89], 15-28. https://web2.mlp.cz/koweb/00/04/29/26/11/twitter_and_society.pdf
Coleman, J. W. (1998). Social problems: A brief introduction. Longman Pub Group.
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & society, 19(6), 829-859. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205278639
Cook, J., Das Sarma, A., Fabrikant, A., & Tomkins, A. (2012). Your two weeks of fame and your grandmother's. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '12) (pp. 919-928). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187959
Dumanlı Kürkçü, D. (2018). Twitter kullanicilarinin cinsel istismar olaylarina verdikleri tepkiler: kullanicilarin profili ve içerik analizi. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 30, 53-65. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/pausbed/issue/80660/1381500
Dwivedi, P. K., & Pandey, I. (2013). Role of media in social awareness. International Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 1(1), 67-70. http://bit.ly/3VnV6yS
Eroğuz, K. (October 25, 2022). Kadına Yönelik Şiddette Dünya Liderliği. https://turkiyeraporu.com/?p=11275
Etter, M. A., & Nielsen, F. Å. (2015). Collective remembering of organizations: Co-construction of organizational pasts in Wikipedia. Corporate Communications, 20(4), 431-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-09-2014-0059
Euronews. (March 31, 2022). Percentage of women subjected to physical or sexual violence by men: Türkiye leads Europe and the OECD. https://tr.euronews.com/2022/03/31/erkeklerden-fiziksel-veya-cinsel-siddet-goren-kad-nlar-n-oran-avrupa-ve-oecd-nin-lideri-tu
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12180
Federation of the Women Associations in Türkiye & United Nations Population Fund (2023). Statistical Analysis Report of Domestic Violence Emergency Hotline Data for the Years 2007-2021. https://turkiye.unfpa.org/tr/tkdf-ev-ici-siddet-raporu-2023
Ferron, M., & Massa, P. (2011a). The Arab Spring| wikirevolutions: Wikipedia as a lens for studying the real-time formation of collective memories of revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1313-1332. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1238
Ferron, M., & Massa, P. (2011b). Collective memory building in Wikipedia: the case of North African uprisings. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym '11) (pp. 114-123). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038578
Fiske, J. (2010). Introduction to Communication Studies (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837382
García-Gavilanes, R., Mollgaard, A., Tsvetkova, M., & Yasseri, T. (2017). The memory remains: Understanding collective memory in the digital age. Science advances, 3(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602368
Goldberg, H. (2018). The dangers of being a man: Keeping the myth of male privilege alive. Totem Publisher.
Gressard, L. A., Swahn, M. H., & Tharp, A. T. (2015). A first look at gender inequality as a societal risk factor for dating violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(3), 448-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.05.017
Griffin, N. R., Fleck, C. R., Uitvlugt, M. G., Ravizza, S. M., & Fenn, K. M. (2017). The tweeter matters: Factors that affect false memory from Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.032
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory University of Chicago Press. Chicago IL.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Peterson, C. K. (2009). Supine body position reduces neural response to anger evocation. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1209-1210. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02416.x
Head of Communications(2021). Statement on Türkiye's Withdrawal from the Istanbul Convention. https://www.iletisim.gov.tr/turkce/haberler/detay/turkiyenin-istanbul-sozlesmesinden-cekilmesine-iliskin-aciklama
Henslin, J. M. (2007). Sociology: A down-to-earth approach. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Hickman, L., Thapa, S., Tay, L., Cao, M., & Srinivasan, P. (2022). Text preprocessing for text mining in organizational research: Review and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 114-146. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/1094428120971683
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
Kanhabua, N., Niederée, C., & Siberski, W. (2013). Towards concise preservation by managed forgetting: Research issues and case study. In J. Borbinha, M. Nelson & S. Knight (Eds.), iPRES 2013 – 10th International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects (pp. 252-257). https://purl.pt/24107/1/iPres2013_PDF/iPres2013-Proceedings.pdf
Keçeli, D. (2020). Özgecan Aslan Cilnayeti: Twitter Üzerinden Eleştirel Bir Okuma. Anadolu University.
Koyuncu Lorasdaği, B., & Onur İnce, F. H. (2004). The Unseen Face of Hegemonic Masculinity: Thoughts on the Formations and Crises of Masculinity in the Socialization Process. Toplum ve Bilim, 101, 31-49.
Koyuncu, A. A. (2013). Family research methodology: Approaches and methods. In M. Aydın (Ed.), Systematic Family Sociology, 41-64.
Kurtuluş, C., Tol, U. U., & Küçükkural, Ö. (2004). In Pursuit of Hegemonic Masculinity. Toplum ve Bilim, 101, 50-70.
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010). What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web (WWW '10) (pp. 591-600). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772751
Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. Journal of behavioral decision making, 19(2), 115-137. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/bdm.515
Leslie, G. R., & Korman, S. K. (1967). The family in social context. Oxford University Press New York.
Lupton, D. (1994). Food, memory and meaning: the symbolic and social nature of food events. The Sociological Review, 42(4), 664-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1994.tb00105.x
Mazza, M., Marano, G., Lai, C., Janiri, L., & Sani, G. (2020). Danger in danger: Interpersonal violence during COVID-19 quarantine. Psychiatry research, 289, 113046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113046
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McCombs, M., & Valenzuela, S. (2007). The agenda-setting theory. Cuadernos de información, 20, 44-50. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/971/97120369004.pdf
Mehta, A. M., Bruns, A., & Newton, J. (2017). Trust, but verify: social media models for disaster management. Disasters, 41(3), 549-565. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12218
Murthy, D. (2011). Twitter: Microphone for the masses? Media, Culture & Society, 33(5), 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711404744
Okray, Z. (2020). ‘Şule Çet İçin Adalet’: Bir Twitter Etiketi Üzerine İçerik Analizi. Kadın/Woman 2000 - Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(2). 59-83. https://www.acarindex.com/kadinwoman-2000-kadin-arastirmalari-dergisi/sule-cet-icin-adalet-bir-twitter-etiketi-uzerine-icerik-analizi-252584
Öksüzoğlu, T. Ö. (2021). Kadınlara Yönelik Siber Zorbalık Durumları ve Önlem Çalışmaları. European Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 6(1), 67-75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ejees/issue/62607/896677
Oktan, A. (2008). From hegemonic masculinity to crisis of masculinity in Turkish cinema: Yazı-Tura and the limits of the crisis of masculinity. Selçuk Communication, 5(2), 152-166. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/177913
Onaran, O., Büker, S., & Bir, A. A. (1998). Field research on male roles and attitudes in Eskisehir, Turkey. Anadolu Üniversitesi Publications.
Orcutt, J. D. (1990). Reviewed Work: Contemporary Social Problems by V. N. Parrillo, J. Stimson, A. Stimson. Teaching Sociology, 18(1), 90-92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318243
Ozaki, R., & Otis, M. D. (2017). Gender equality, patriarchal cultural norms, and perpetration of intimate partner violence: Comparison of male university students in Asian and European cultural contexts. Violence Against Women, 23(9), 1076-1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216654575
Özçatal, E. Ö. (2011). Ataerkillik, Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Kadının Çalışma Yaşamına Katılımı. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 21-39. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/382051
Rivara, F., Adhia, A., Lyons, V., Massey, A., Mills, B., Morgan, E., Simckes, M., & Rowhani-Rahbar, A. (2019). The effects of violence on health. Health Affairs, 38(10), 1622-1629. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00480
Ruether, R. R. (2007). Feminist theologies: Legacy and prospect. Fortress Press. https://archive.org/details/feministtheologi0000unse_f1w7/page/n3/mode/2up
Schieman, S. (2010). The sociological study of anger: Basic social patterns and contexts. In M. Potegal, G. Stemmler, & C. Spielberger (Eds.), International handbook of anger: Constituent and concomitant biological, psychological, and social processes (pp. 329–347). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89676-2_19
Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. WW Norton & Company.
Sennett, R. (2007). The culture of the new capitalism. Yale University Press.
Silsüpür, Ö., & Övüç, M. (2022). The Usage of Social Media to Create Public Awareness and Opinion against Violence of Woman: A Research on Women’s Non-Governmental Organizations. Uluslararası Medya Ve İletişim Araştırmaları Hakemli Dergisi, 5(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.33464/mediaj.997282
Sturken, M. (2008). Memory, consumerism and media: Reflections on the emergence of the field. Memory Studies, 1(1), 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698007083890
Sultana, A. M. (2010). Patriarchy and women’s gender ideology: A socio-cultural perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 123-126. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.123.126
Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/14848
Uğurluoğlu, D., & Erdem, R. (2019). The Impact of Individuals’ Spiritual Well-Being Who Go Through a Trauma on Posttraumatic Growth. Dokuz Eylul University The Journal of Graduate School of Social Sciences, 21(3), 833-858. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.507731
We Will Stop Femicide Platform Establishment (January 2, 2024). 2023 Annual Data Report. https://kadincinayetlerinidurduracagiz.net/veriler/3088/2023-yillik-veri-raporu
Wheeler, J. (2018). Mining the first 100 days: Human and data ethics in Twitter research. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 6(2). 1-23. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2235
Whiting, D., Lichtenstein, P., & Fazel, S. (2021). Violence and mental disorders: a structured review of associations by individual diagnoses, risk factors, and risk assessment. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30262-5
Yıldız, F., & Dursun, O. (2020). Kamu adaletinin büyük veri aracılığı ile inşası: Şule Çet davası üzerine bir Twitter analizi. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, 58, 291-328. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0009
Yujie, Z., Al Imran Yasin, M., Alsagoff, S. A. B. S., & Hoon, A. L. (2022). The mediating role of new media engagement in this digital age. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.879530